Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.
AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.
A simple and reliable method which allows one to distinguish between the two major microscopic scenarios for the suppression of the switching polarization (P-r(s)), i.e., pinning of ferroelectric domain walls (DWs) through the Pb(Zr,Ti)O-3 film (PZT) (bulk scenario) and inhibition of the growth of opposite domains due to the nucleus suppression at the electrode interfaces (interface scenario), is proposed. In addition, a new electric treatment able to significantly suppress P-r(s) in Pt-PZT-Pt ferroelectric capacitors (FECAPs) of thicknesses above 1.4 mu m, was discovered and studied. It consists of the application of an external alternating electric field (E-e) which cycles the polarization at very low frequency (1.7 mHz). After only 10-20 cycles, P-r(s) can be suppressed by a factor of 10. The same FECAP, when subjected to E-e at higher frequency (30 kHz), endures at least 10(8) switches, before attaining an equivalent P-r(s), suppression (hereafter called fatigue). The fatigued states obtained with the two different procedures appear to be different. In the first case (slow cycling) it is suggested that the suppression of P-r(s) is related to the DW pinning scenario, whereas in the second case-which corresponds to the normal fatiguing procedure-it is related to the interface scenario. (C) 1998 American Institute of Physics. [S0003-6951(98)01619-2].