Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
A simple and reliable method which allows one to distinguish between the two major microscopic scenarios for the suppression of the switching polarization (P-r(s)), i.e., pinning of ferroelectric domain walls (DWs) through the Pb(Zr,Ti)O-3 film (PZT) (bulk scenario) and inhibition of the growth of opposite domains due to the nucleus suppression at the electrode interfaces (interface scenario), is proposed. In addition, a new electric treatment able to significantly suppress P-r(s) in Pt-PZT-Pt ferroelectric capacitors (FECAPs) of thicknesses above 1.4 mu m, was discovered and studied. It consists of the application of an external alternating electric field (E-e) which cycles the polarization at very low frequency (1.7 mHz). After only 10-20 cycles, P-r(s) can be suppressed by a factor of 10. The same FECAP, when subjected to E-e at higher frequency (30 kHz), endures at least 10(8) switches, before attaining an equivalent P-r(s), suppression (hereafter called fatigue). The fatigued states obtained with the two different procedures appear to be different. In the first case (slow cycling) it is suggested that the suppression of P-r(s) is related to the DW pinning scenario, whereas in the second case-which corresponds to the normal fatiguing procedure-it is related to the interface scenario. (C) 1998 American Institute of Physics. [S0003-6951(98)01619-2].