Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.
AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.
Let f (n, v, e) denote the maximum number of edges in a 3-uniform hypergraph on n vertices which does not contain v vertices spanning at least e edges. A central problem in extremal combinatorics, famously posed by Brown, Erdos and sos in 1973, asks whether f (n, e + 3, e) = o(n())(2) for every e >= 3. A classical result of Sarkozy and Selkow states that f (n, e + [log(2) e] + 2, e) = o(n(2)) for every e >= 3. This result was recently improved by Motivated by applications to other problems, Gowers and Long made the striking conjecture that f (n, e + 4, e) = O(n(2-epsilon)) for some epsilon = epsilon(e) >0. Conlon, Gishboliner, Levanzov and Shapira, and later, Shapira and Tyomkyn reiterated the following approximate version of this problem. What is the smallest d(e) for which f (n, e + d(e), e) = O(n(2-epsilon)) for some epsilon = epsilon(e) >0? In this paper, we prove that for each e >= 3 we have f (n, e+ [log(2) e] +38,e) = O(n(2-epsilon)) for some epsilon > 0. This shows that one can already obtain power saving near the Sarkozy-Selkow bound at the cost of a small additive constant.