Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
Let f (n, v, e) denote the maximum number of edges in a 3-uniform hypergraph on n vertices which does not contain v vertices spanning at least e edges. A central problem in extremal combinatorics, famously posed by Brown, Erdos and sos in 1973, asks whether f (n, e + 3, e) = o(n())(2) for every e >= 3. A classical result of Sarkozy and Selkow states that f (n, e + [log(2) e] + 2, e) = o(n(2)) for every e >= 3. This result was recently improved by Motivated by applications to other problems, Gowers and Long made the striking conjecture that f (n, e + 4, e) = O(n(2-epsilon)) for some epsilon = epsilon(e) >0. Conlon, Gishboliner, Levanzov and Shapira, and later, Shapira and Tyomkyn reiterated the following approximate version of this problem. What is the smallest d(e) for which f (n, e + d(e), e) = O(n(2-epsilon)) for some epsilon = epsilon(e) >0? In this paper, we prove that for each e >= 3 we have f (n, e+ [log(2) e] +38,e) = O(n(2-epsilon)) for some epsilon > 0. This shows that one can already obtain power saving near the Sarkozy-Selkow bound at the cost of a small additive constant.