Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
Objective: To design a VCG lead system dedicated to the analysis of atrial fibrillation. Methods: Body surface potentials during atrial fibrillation were simulated by using a biophysical model of the human atria and thorax. The XYZ components of the equivalent dipole were derived from the Gabor-Nelson equations. These served as the gold standard while searching for methods for the derivation of the vectorcardiogram from a limited number of electrode positions and their transfer coefficients. Six electrode configurations and dedicated matrices were tested using 10 different episodes of simulated AF and 25 different thorax models. Results: RMS-based relative estimation error of the VCG using the Frank electrodes was 0.39. An adaptation of the 9 electrodes of the standard ECG, including one electrode on the back, reduced the error to 0.24. Conclusion: The Frank lead system is suboptimal for estimating the VCG during AF. Alternative electrode configurations should include at least one electrode on the back.