Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.
AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.
Objective: To design a VCG lead system dedicated to the analysis of atrial fibrillation. Methods: Body surface potentials during atrial fibrillation were simulated by using a biophysical model of the human atria and thorax. The XYZ components of the equivalent dipole were derived from the Gabor-Nelson equations. These served as the gold standard while searching for methods for the derivation of the vectorcardiogram from a limited number of electrode positions and their transfer coefficients. Six electrode configurations and dedicated matrices were tested using 10 different episodes of simulated AF and 25 different thorax models. Results: RMS-based relative estimation error of the VCG using the Frank electrodes was 0.39. An adaptation of the 9 electrodes of the standard ECG, including one electrode on the back, reduced the error to 0.24. Conclusion: The Frank lead system is suboptimal for estimating the VCG during AF. Alternative electrode configurations should include at least one electrode on the back.