Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
The electron optical phase contrast probed by electron holography at n-n+ GaN doping steps is found to exhibit a giant enhancement, in sharp contrast to the always smaller than expected phase contrast reported for p-n junctions. We unravel the physical origin of the giant enhancement by combining off-axis electron holography data with self-consistent electrostatic potential calculations. The predominant contribution to the phase contrast is shown to arise from the doping dependent screening length of the surface Fermi-level pinning, which is induced by FIB-implanted carbon point defects below the outer amorphous shell. The contribution of the built-in potential is negligible for modulation doping and only relevant for large built-in potentials at e.g. p-n junctions. This work provides a quantitative approach to so-called dead layers at TEM lamellas.
Edoardo Charbon, Claudio Bruschini, Ekin Kizilkan, Utku Karaca
Nicolas Grandjean, Jean-François Carlin, Raphaël Butté