Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.
AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.
Atom-to-atom mapping (AAM) assigns reactant atoms to product atoms and is fundamental for reaction classification, template extraction, and synthesis planning. RXNMapper derives AAM from the attention of a Transformer model trained by masked language modeling on unmapped reaction SMILES. However, its original model selection relied on USPTO-50K, a validation set later shown to contain erroneous mappings. Here we revisit RXNMapper using a curated validation set of 4’533 reactions from the dataset Pistachio. We retrained ALBERT-based RXNMapper models on USPTOfull and Pistachio and selected the best head, layer, and checkpoint on this new validation set. To improve the comparison of AAM algorithms, we developed an evaluation framework that removes ambiguous reference reactions and compares predictions by reaction graph isomorphism rather than direct string matching, avoiding false negatives from inconsistent formats and symmetry-equivalent mappings. Across the golden dataset, Pistachio, and an internal AstraZeneca medicinal chemistry benchmark, the updated models outperform the original RXNMapper and LocalMapper, while rearrangements remain persistent challenges.