Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
Atom-to-atom mapping (AAM) assigns reactant atoms to product atoms and is fundamental for reaction classification, template extraction, and synthesis planning. RXNMapper derives AAM from the attention of a Transformer model trained by masked language modeling on unmapped reaction SMILES. However, its original model selection relied on USPTO-50K, a validation set later shown to contain erroneous mappings. Here we revisit RXNMapper using a curated validation set of 4’533 reactions from the dataset Pistachio. We retrained ALBERT-based RXNMapper models on USPTOfull and Pistachio and selected the best head, layer, and checkpoint on this new validation set. To improve the comparison of AAM algorithms, we developed an evaluation framework that removes ambiguous reference reactions and compares predictions by reaction graph isomorphism rather than direct string matching, avoiding false negatives from inconsistent formats and symmetry-equivalent mappings. Across the golden dataset, Pistachio, and an internal AstraZeneca medicinal chemistry benchmark, the updated models outperform the original RXNMapper and LocalMapper, while rearrangements remain persistent challenges.