Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.
AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.
The fib Model Code 2010 (MC2010) contains a semi-empirical formulation for the local bond-slip relationship for both pull-out and splitting failure modes (derived from short pull-out tests), as well as a semi-empirical formulation of the steel stress that can be activated in the reinforcement as a function of the anchorage length (anchorage resistance derived from a large database of lapped joint and anchorage tests). Considering equilibrium and compatibility conditions, the anchorage strength can be calculated on the basis of the local bond-slip relationship. Using this approach with the bond-slip relationship of MC2010, the obtained anchorage strengths are not consistent with the anchorage resistance according to the same code. Recent works have shown discrepancies between measured local bond-slip responses and the proposal of MC2010. Within this frame, this paper presents an experimental programme consisting of pull-out tests instrumented with detailed measurement systems (digital image correlation and fibre-optic measurements). The results show the effect of the evaluated parameters in the local bond-slip relationship along the bar. The different local bond-slip responses can be explained by the crack development in the surrounding concrete.