Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.
AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.
Members of the bacterial species Vibrio cholerae are known both as prominent constituents of marine environments and as the causative agents of cholera, a severe diarrheal disease. While strains responsible for cholera have been extensively studied over the past century, less is known about their environmental counterparts, despite their contributions to the species’ pangenome. This study analyzed the genome compositions of 46 V. cholerae strains, including pandemic and non-pandemic, toxigenic, and environmental variants, to investigate the diversity of mobile genetic elements (MGEs), embedded bacterial defense systems, and phage-associated signatures. Our findings include both conserved and novel MGEs across strains, pointing to shared evolutionary pathways and ecological niches. The defensome analysis revealed a wide array of antiphage/anti-plasmid mechanisms, extending well beyond the traditional CRISPR-Cas and restriction-modification systems. This underscores the dynamic arms race between V. cholerae and MGEs and suggests that non-pandemic strains may act as reservoirs for emerging defense strategies. Moreover, the study showed that MGEs are integrated into genomic hotspots, which may serve as critical platforms for the exchange of defense systems, thereby enhancing V. cholerae's adaptive capabilities against phage attacks and other invading MGEs. Overall, this research offers new insights into V. cholerae’s genetic complexity and potential adaptive strategies, offering a better understanding of the differences between environmental strains and their pandemic counterparts, as well as the possible evolutionary pathways that led to the emergence of pandemic strains.
Rizlan Bernier-Latmani, Karin Lederballe Meibom, Nicolas Louis Maurice Jacquemin, Hugo Sallet