Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.
AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.
If W is the simple random walk on the square lattice Z(2), then W induces a random walk W-G on any spanning subgraph G subset of Z(2) of the lattice as follows: viewing W as a uniformly random infinite word on the alphabet {x, -x, y, -y}, the walk W-G starts at the origin and follows the directions specified by W, only accepting steps of W along which the walk W-G does not exit G. For any fixed G subset of Z(2), the walk W-G is distributed as the simple random walk on G, and hence W-G is almost surely recurrent in the sense that W-G visits every site reachable from the origin in G infinitely often. This fact naturally leads us to ask the following: does W almost surely have the property that W-G is recurrent for every G subset of Z(2)? We answer this question negatively, demonstrating that exceptional subgraphs exist almost surely. In fact, we show more to be true: exceptional subgraphs continue to exist almost surely for a countable collection of independent simple random walks, but on the other hand, there are almost surely no exceptional subgraphs for a branching random walk.