Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
If W is the simple random walk on the square lattice Z(2), then W induces a random walk W-G on any spanning subgraph G subset of Z(2) of the lattice as follows: viewing W as a uniformly random infinite word on the alphabet {x, -x, y, -y}, the walk W-G starts at the origin and follows the directions specified by W, only accepting steps of W along which the walk W-G does not exit G. For any fixed G subset of Z(2), the walk W-G is distributed as the simple random walk on G, and hence W-G is almost surely recurrent in the sense that W-G visits every site reachable from the origin in G infinitely often. This fact naturally leads us to ask the following: does W almost surely have the property that W-G is recurrent for every G subset of Z(2)? We answer this question negatively, demonstrating that exceptional subgraphs exist almost surely. In fact, we show more to be true: exceptional subgraphs continue to exist almost surely for a countable collection of independent simple random walks, but on the other hand, there are almost surely no exceptional subgraphs for a branching random walk.