Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.
AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.
Proximity labeling technologies are limited to indexing localized protein residents. Such data—although valuable—cannot inform on small-molecule responsivity of local residents. We here bridge this gap by demonstrating in live C. elegans how electrophile-sensing propensity in specific organs can be quantitatively mapped and ranked. Using this method, >70% of tissue-specific responders exhibit electrophile responsivity, independent of tissue-specific abundance. One responder, cyp-33e1—for which both human and worm orthologs are electrophile responsive—marshals stress-dependent gut functions, despite manifesting uniform abundance across all tissues studied. Cyp-33e1’s localized electrophile responsivity operates site specifically, triggering multifaceted responses: electrophile sensing through the catalytic-site cysteine results in partitioning between enzyme inhibition and localized production of a critical metabolite that governs global lipid availability, whereas rapid dual-cysteine site-specific sensing modulates gut homeostasis. Beyond pinpointing chemical actionability within local proteomes, organ-specific electrophile responsivity mapping illuminates otherwise intractable locale-specific metabolite signaling and stress response programs influencing organ-specific decision-making.