Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
Proximity labeling technologies are limited to indexing localized protein residents. Such data—although valuable—cannot inform on small-molecule responsivity of local residents. We here bridge this gap by demonstrating in live C. elegans how electrophile-sensing propensity in specific organs can be quantitatively mapped and ranked. Using this method, >70% of tissue-specific responders exhibit electrophile responsivity, independent of tissue-specific abundance. One responder, cyp-33e1—for which both human and worm orthologs are electrophile responsive—marshals stress-dependent gut functions, despite manifesting uniform abundance across all tissues studied. Cyp-33e1’s localized electrophile responsivity operates site specifically, triggering multifaceted responses: electrophile sensing through the catalytic-site cysteine results in partitioning between enzyme inhibition and localized production of a critical metabolite that governs global lipid availability, whereas rapid dual-cysteine site-specific sensing modulates gut homeostasis. Beyond pinpointing chemical actionability within local proteomes, organ-specific electrophile responsivity mapping illuminates otherwise intractable locale-specific metabolite signaling and stress response programs influencing organ-specific decision-making.