Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.
AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.
In this paper, we show how the inclusion of structured products affects the performance of a portfolio of primary assets. We consider fairly priced, synthetic structured products (convertible bonds, reverse convertibles, or barrier reverse convertibles) that we include in a 60/40 portfolio (60 % stocks and 40 % bonds), a typical portfolio held by institutional investors. We demonstrate that including structured products in the 60/40 portfolio generally lowers returns and risk-adjusted performance across all product types. Moreover, we evaluate the opportunity costs-in terms of utility-of including structured products in the 60/40 portfolio. We demonstrate that the opportunity cost is overwhelmingly negative, implying that investors who choose to include structured products in their portfolios suffer from a disutility. Our findings are robust to alternative settings. We expect further performance deterioration for real-world structured products that are highly illiquid, exhibit high transaction costs, and are often more complex than the products we are considering.