Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
In this paper, we show how the inclusion of structured products affects the performance of a portfolio of primary assets. We consider fairly priced, synthetic structured products (convertible bonds, reverse convertibles, or barrier reverse convertibles) that we include in a 60/40 portfolio (60 % stocks and 40 % bonds), a typical portfolio held by institutional investors. We demonstrate that including structured products in the 60/40 portfolio generally lowers returns and risk-adjusted performance across all product types. Moreover, we evaluate the opportunity costs-in terms of utility-of including structured products in the 60/40 portfolio. We demonstrate that the opportunity cost is overwhelmingly negative, implying that investors who choose to include structured products in their portfolios suffer from a disutility. Our findings are robust to alternative settings. We expect further performance deterioration for real-world structured products that are highly illiquid, exhibit high transaction costs, and are often more complex than the products we are considering.