Critiquing as an alternative to generating concept maps to support knowledge integration processes

As constructing concept maps from scratch can be time consuming, this study explores critiquing given concept maps with deliberate errors as an alternative. A form of concept map that distinguishes between different levels, called Knowledge Integration Map (KIM), was used as an assessment and embedded learning tool. The technology-enhanced biology unit was implemented in four high school science classes (n=93). Student dyads in each class were randomly assigned to the KIM generation (n=41) or critique (n=52) task. Dyads in the generation group created their own connections from a given list of concepts, while dyads in the critique group received a concept map that included commonly found errors. KIMs in both groups consisted of the same concepts. Findings indicate that generating or critiquing KIMs can facilitate the construc-tion of cross-level connections. Furthermore, results suggest that critiquing con-cept maps might be a more time-efficient alternative to generating concept maps from scratch.