Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
Interfaces govern the unique mechanical response of amorphous multilayers. Here, we examine nanoindentation hardness and deformation behaviour of amorphous/amorphous Ta2O5/SiO2 nanolaminates with bilayer thickness ranging from 2 nm to 334 nm. While monolithic SiO2 exhibits catastrophic failure through a single dominant shear band, multilayer architectures demonstrate varied deformation mechanisms. Hardness decreases with reduced bilayer thickness, from 7.7 GPa at 334 nm to 5.5 GPa at 2 nm spacing, contrasting with crystalline systems, which strengthen with decreasing spacing. Cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy reveals that fine bilayer thickness promotes closely spaced vertical shear bands accompanied by bilayer compression, while coarser spacings show fewer, widely spaced shear bands with chemical intermixing. Scanning precession electron diffraction mapping demonstrates significant densification beneath indents. The high interface density facilitates strain accommodation that prevents catastrophic failure typical of brittle amorphous materials.