Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
Two W protection schemes for direct-contact bottom electrodes for PZT thin films, namely RuO2/Cr and RuO2/Ru, were compared with respect to protective performance and contact resistance up to 800 degrees C annealing temperature in oxygen. Cr clearly offers better protection for W than Ru-based schemes by forming a passivating Cr2O3 layer. No Cr is detected on the RuO2 surface, even after annealing at 800 degrees C, due to its entrapment by RuO2 by oxidoreduction. However, the formation of a continuous Cr2O3 film at the RuO2/Cr interface gives rise to an increased contact resistance above 650 degrees C. RuO2/Ru does not show any measurable contact resistance on W, but fails above 600 degrees C.
Mihai Adrian Ionescu, Igor Stolichnov