Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
Interfaces in metal and ceramic composites differ from interfaces in polymer matrix composites inasmuch as: (i) fiber degradation due to chemical reaction with the matrix at processing temperatures is frequent and (ii) bonding at the interface is generally chemical in nature (i.e. features primary chemical bond formation across the interface). Elementary analysis of requirements placed on the interface for mechanical property optimization indicate that, for toughening by fiber debonding and pull-out, very weakly bonded interfaces are needed. Sufficiently weak interfaces can be obtained by using interfacial layers of materials such as graphite or boron nitride which feature strongly anisotropic chemical bonding. Several tough inorganic composite utilize such interfaces. With large fibers in ductile matrices, however, strong interfaces are desirable if the matrix can provide sufficient resistance to crack propagation.