Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
The effect of limestone on the hydration and microstructural development of ultra high performance concrete (UHPC) with different levels of replacement (34%, 54% and 74% by volume) was investigated. Up to 54% replacement of cement by limestone the mixes showed better workability and higher compressive strength (170 MPa at 56 days for 54% addition) compared to a classical mix (155 MPa) with no limestone replacement. The kinetics of hydration were compared for different replacement levels using isothermal calorimetry. The phase development was quantified by X-ray diffraction with Rietveld method combined with thermal gravimetric analysis. The pore structure was examined by mercury intrusion porosimetry. The composition of hydration products was determined by scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-ray analysis. The results showed that the hydration degree of the cement is increased from 39% for classical UHPC to 66% for the UHPC with 54% of limestone. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Morgan Julien André Barbey-Binggeli
Mihai Adrian Ionescu, Victor Carle Adrien Boureau, Pasquale Scarlino, Fabio Bersano, Niccolò Martinolli, Michele Ghini
Duncan Thomas Lindsay Alexander, Chih-Ying Hsu