Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
Redox-targeted flow batteries (RTFBs) are promising for large-scale energy storage but suffer from poor solid booster utilization. This study examines how binder selection affects the reaction rate between a LiFePO 4 /FePO 4 solid booster composite and a dissolved [Fe(CN) 6 ] 4−/3− redox mediator. The porosity and hydrophilicity of LiFePO 4 composites correlate with booster utilization, determined by galvanostatic cell cycling and by in situ UV−Vis spectroscopy. Compared with state-of-the-art polyvinylidene difluoride composites, booster pellets containing non-fluorinated, biodegradable polycaprolactone or cellulose acetate binders exhibit up to 175% higher LiFePO 4 conversion rates and improved capacity utilization at cycling rates up to 10 mA cm −2. Solid-material utilization directly correlates with binder hydrophilicity, establishing it as a key design parameter for RTFBs and offering a straightforward path toward more efficient and non-fluorinated booster formulations.