Lecture

Controversies Study: Interpretive Flexibility and Closure Mechanisms

Graph Chat

Chat with Graph Search

Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.

DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.

In course

HUM-428: Science, technology and environment I

The aim of the course is to acquire the concepts and methods of Science and Technology Studies in order to learn how to decode the interweaving of science and technology in society by applying these elements to the general issues of innovation. ...

Description

This lecture delves into the study of controversies in scientific groups, focusing on interpretive flexibility and closure mechanisms. It explores how different theories are driven by professional interests and social groups, leading to competitions and rivalries. The instructor discusses the role of aesthetics, relationships, and professional investments in shaping scientific debates. By analyzing the divergent interests and social mechanisms involved, the lecture sheds light on the symmetrical treatment of controversies and the factors that lead to their closure.

Instructor

Dominique Vinck

Official source

Related concepts (22)

Scientific community

The scientific community is a diverse network of interacting scientists. It includes many "sub-communities" working on particular scientific fields, and within particular institutions; interdisciplinary and cross-institutional activities are also significant. Objectivity is expected to be achieved by the scientific method. Peer review, through discussion and debate within journals and conferences, assists in this objectivity by maintaining the quality of research methodology and interpretation of results.

Scientific method

The scientific method is an empirical method for acquiring knowledge that has characterized the development of science since at least the 17th century (with notable practitioners in previous centuries; see the article history of scientific method for additional detail.) It involves careful observation, applying rigorous skepticism about what is observed, given that cognitive assumptions can distort how one interprets the observation.

Theory

A theory is a rational type of abstract thinking about a phenomenon, or the results of such thinking. The process of contemplative and rational thinking is often associated with such processes as observational study or research. Theories may be scientific, belong to a non-scientific discipline, or no discipline at all. Depending on the context, a theory's assertions might, for example, include generalized explanations of how nature works. The word has its roots in ancient Greek, but in modern use it has taken on several related meanings.

Interpretations of quantum mechanics

An interpretation of quantum mechanics is an attempt to explain how the mathematical theory of quantum mechanics might correspond to experienced reality. Although quantum mechanics has held up to rigorous and extremely precise tests in an extraordinarily broad range of experiments, there exist a number of contending schools of thought over their interpretation. These views on interpretation differ on such fundamental questions as whether quantum mechanics is deterministic or stochastic, local or non-local, which elements of quantum mechanics can be considered real, and what the nature of measurement is, among other matters.

Copenhagen interpretation

The Copenhagen interpretation is a collection of views about the meaning of quantum mechanics, stemming from the work of Niels Bohr, Werner Heisenberg, Max Born, and others. The term "Copenhagen interpretation" was apparently coined by Heisenberg during the 1950s to refer to ideas developed in the 1925–1927 period, glossing over his disagreements with Bohr. Consequently, there is no definitive historical statement of what the interpretation entails.

Related lectures (60)

Controversy Analysis: Controversy Studies

Explores the analysis of scientific controversies, including rivalries between social groups, interpretive flexibility, and closure mechanisms.

Finite Element Modeling

Covers the basics of finite element modeling and discusses common pitfalls in modeling, discretization, resolution, and result interpretation.

Barycenters: Theory

Covers the theory of barycenters, exploring their physical interpretation and localization.

Quantum Mechanics: Double-Slit Experiment

Covers the postulates of Quantum Mechanics, the double-slit experiment, and the path integral formulation's significance in understanding quantum phenomena.

Lab Notebook Essentials