Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.
AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.
SPAD arrays are becoming a popular choice for measuring two-photon interference effects thanks to their high timing precision, fast readout, and high quantum efficiency. However, such sensors are affected by cross-talk that may mimic the useful signal. Even with a low probability of seeing cross-talk effect between neighboring SPADs, it was found that it still may reach the farther channels up to a half of millimeter away. Moreover, the use of microlenses that help SPADs achieve even better efficiency further boosts the cross-talk effect. In this work, we characterize the cross-talk effect and compare it to the Hanbury Brown-Twiss effect in the LinoSPAD2 camera, which has a linear sensor of 512 SPADs. Additionally, we compare the results between sensors with and without the microlenses. Finally, we present a timing calibration technique for the detector that utilizes the cross-talk effect.