Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.
AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.
Several old and new finite-element preconditioners for nodal-based spectral discretizations of −laplace(u) = f in the domain (d = 2 or 3), with Dirichlet or Neumann boundary conditions, are considered and compared in terms of bothcondition number and computational efficiency. The computational domain covers the case of classical single-domain spectral approximations (see [5]), as well as that of more general spectral-element methods in which the preconditioners are expressed in terms of local (upon every element) algebraic solvers. The primal spectral approximation is based on the Galerkin approach with Numerical Integration (G-NI) at the Legendre-Gauss-Lobatto (LGL) nodes in the domain. The preconditioning matrices rely on either P1 or Q1 or Q1,NI (i.e., with Numerical Integration) finite elements on meshes whose vertices coincide with the LGL nodes used for the spectral approximation. The analysis highlights certain preconditioners, that yield the solution at an overall cost proportional to Nd+1, where N denotes the polynomial degree in each direction.
Annalisa Buffa, Pablo Antolin Sanchez, Giuliano Guarino
Jan Sickmann Hesthaven, Niccolo' Discacciati
Katrin Beyer, Savvas Saloustros