Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.
AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.
We consider a setup in which confidential i.i.d. samples X1, . . . , Xn from an unknown finite-support distribution p are passed through n copies of a discrete privatization chan- nel (a.k.a. mechanism) producing outputs Y1, . . . , Yn. The channel law guarantees a local differential privacy of ε. Subject to a prescribed privacy level ε, the optimal channel should be designed such that an estimate of the source distribution based on the channel out- puts Y1, . . . , Yn converges as fast as possible to the exact value p. For this purpose we study the convergence to zero of three distribution distance metrics: f-divergence, mean- squared error and total variation. We derive the respective normalized first-order terms of convergence (as n → ∞), which for a given target privacy ε represent a rule-of-thumb factor by which the sample size must be augmented so as to achieve the same estimation accuracy as that of a non-randomizing channel. We formulate the privacy–fidelity trade-off problem as being that of minimizing said first-order term under a privacy constraint ε. We further identify a scalar quantity that captures the essence of this trade-off, and prove bounds and data-processing inequalities on this quantity. For some specific instances of the privacy–fidelity trade-off problem, we derive inner and outer bounds on the optimal trade-off curve.