Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.
AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.
Membrane-based carbon capture offers an energy-efficient and environmentally-friendly alternative to conventional absorption-based processes, yet remains limited by its performance with dilute CO₂ sources such as natural gas power plants. We present a techno-economic assessment of a pyridinic-N-substituted graphene membrane that yields increasingly high CO₂ permeance and selectivity, as feed concentration decreases. This unique behavior substantially reduces energy consumption, process footprint, and capture costs. Using uncertainty-aware cost modeling, including membrane cost, electricity prices, contingency factors, and learning curves—we show that capture costs can reach 25–50 per ton CO₂ for coal and cement plants, positioning this technology favorably against state-of-the-art absorption and adsorption processes. Our work bridges material innovation with process optimization, and highlights the role of advanced membrane materials and process design in driving cost-effective, scalable CO₂ capture solutions for diverse industrial applications.