Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.
AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.
The integration of structural and functional brain connectivity provides a holistic view of the brain’s organization, but its application in Graph Neural Network (GNN) models for predicting “brain age” is understudied, and a systematic benchmark of optimal data fusion strategies is currently lacking. We systematically benchmark the performances of early and late fusion multimodal architectures against single-modality models for brain age prediction using structural and functional connectomes, using five different GNN backbones on 747 healthy participants (median age, 16.3 years; IQR 13.5-18.5 years) obtained from the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort. The late fusion architecture improved performance over the structural-only baseline in three of five models, with the GCN model achieving the highest overall score in cross-validation (R2=0.639±0.05). The early fusion architecture showed inconsistent results and did not offer a reliable improvement over the single-modality baseline. Finally, it is observed that optimal model architecture depends on the data type: structural brain graphs favor deep, narrow models to capture their hierarchy, whereas functional brain graphs require wider, shallower models.