Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.
AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.
This paper analyzes the relative distribution of annual saturation and contrast effects of discomfort glare in a deep open-plan office. A previous comparative study has shown that while hybrid glare metrics were found to predict glare well in most scenarios occurring in the investigated datasets, contrast-driven glare metrics predict discomfort glare better than saturation-driven metrics in daylit conditions when vertical illuminance is lower than 3000 lux; and saturation-driven glare metrics outperform the contrast-driven metrics when vertical illuminance is above 3000 lux. The focus of this paper is to determine the potential effects of contrast-driven and saturation-driven glare across the floor plan, simulating annual hourly vertical illuminance (Ev) and contrast (log_gc) were simulated in 8 view directions with a grid spacing of 0.75m, at a typical eye level of 1.2m, for daylight hours in the context of Geneva, Switzerland. To identify viewpoints where saturation and contrast effects of glare dominate, a synthetic and versatile spatial visualization approach was established. A new simulation method allowed us to calculate detailed annual saturation and contrast metrics in a reasonable timeframe. Results show that high contrast lighting conditions occur far more frequently than high saturation conditions except for a narrow area near the façade.
Denis Gillet, Juan Carlos Farah, Jérémy Alain La Scala-Jayet