Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.
AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.
Accurate computation of magnetostatic coupling between non-coaxial circular coils remains prohibitively expensive when millions of configurations must be evaluated for design-space exploration. We propose a novel approach based on numerical methods to improve performance by 5 to 7 orders of magnitude while matching the accuracy of state-of-the-art semi-analytical methods. While other approaches strive to reduce the number of integration directions in the six-fold integral to 2 or 4, we propose a five-fold integral with simple-to-evaluate integrands. In place of the filament method, we employ the Gauss-Legendre quadrature due to its exponential convergence and find that numerical integration can be quicker than analytic integral evaluation. Furthermore, to tackle the complexity of allocating the computational resources to each of the five integration directions, we propose a heuristic that leads to 2 orders of magnitude lower computation time or 2 to 4 orders of magnitude higher accuracy. We also provide an implementation of our approach in C-Coil, an open-source C++ library with Python bindings that can also be used in MATLAB.
Salim Bennouna, Abhijit Bhausaheb Bendre, Yoan Rappaz
Yves Perriard, Christian Köchli, Sofia Lydia Ntella, Pooneh Mohaghegh