Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.
AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.
Purpose Compressed-sensing (CS) methods can decrease the acquisition time for T 1 -weighted (T 1 w) structural MRI images to 1–2 min. Rapid acquisitions reduce participant burden, reduce the risk of motion artifacts, and allow for repeat scans to be acquired within a session. This study investigated the tradeoffs of sparse sampling and CS image reconstruction for brain morphometric applications. Methods Magnetization-Prepared Rapid Gradient Echo (MPRAGE) images were acquired at 1.0 mm spatial resolution. The effects of the acceleration factor (x2 to x8) and regularization factor were examined. Subcortical volumes and regional cortical thickness estimates of brain structure were obtained for all T 1 w images. Within-sequence agreement was evaluated by comparing estimates obtained using the same protocol in the same imaging session. Between-sequence agreement was evaluated by comparing estimates from a fully sampled MPRAGE protocol to the novel CS-accelerated MPRAGE protocols within the same session. Results Higher acceleration lowered the SNR in white matter but not in gray matter. SNR could be further manipulated by the regularization parameter. Within-sequence agreement was comparable across all protocols. In fact, the spread in estimates from the 58-s CSx8 protocol was similar to those from the fully sampled protocol. Similarly, high agreement was found between estimates from the fully sampled and under-sampled protocols for all acceleration levels up to eight. Modifying the regularization factor had a quantifiable effect on image smoothness, however it had minimal impact on the agreement of morphometric estimates. Conclusion Accelerated CS imaging protocols show comparable performance to traditional longer protocols for morphometric brain estimates.