Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.
AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.
High-performance membranes have emerged as an energy-efficient alternative to absorption-based postcombustion carbon capture. So far, the techno-economic analyses have been centered around the polymeric membranes. Recently, nanoporous single-layer graphene (NSLG) membranes have yielded large CO2 permeance, making them attractive for capture. Herein, we assess the techno-economic feasibility of NSLG-based capture using an optimized process. The most suitable system to achieve recovery and purity of 90% comprises a double-stage process with (i) recycle of 2nd stage retentate, and (ii) multi-staged vacuum pumps for the permeate, including roots pumps in series with liquid-ring pumps and intermittent condensers for water vapor. The high CO2 permeance of NSLG makes the vacuum process without feed compression more economically competitive, even if the area required is higher. Attractive capture penalties are estimated despite a conservative membrane cost (500 /tonCO2 from wet feeds with CO2 concentration of 10% and 13.5%, respectively, corresponding to energy penalty of 1.53 and 1.24 MJ/kgCO2. For steel and cement industries where CO2 concentration is favorably high (25%) but electricity cost is also higher (0.10–0.20 /tonCO2. Overall, the analysis shows that NSLG membranes are competitive with state-of-the-art processes for postcombustion capture.
Kumar Varoon Agrawal, Cédric Karel J Van Goethem