Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.
AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.
Urban decision-making involves choices made over different time horizons,from short-term daily activity and travel scheduling to long-term residential location and land-use planning. These decisions occur at multiple levels,including individuals, households,and public authorities,and are shaped by interactions both within and across these levels.Short-term choices often involve intra-household interactions,where individuals coordinate their daily activities in response to shared constraints and preferences.Long-term decisions reflect broader spatial interactions,such as those between residents' location and mobility choices and urban policies.These choices also highlight the interplay between transport and land-use systems,underscoring the mutual influence of mobility and spatial development.This thesis contributes to a new generation of travel models by advancing disaggregate approaches,namely activity-based models,and offering aggregate alternatives when such models become overly complex.The work spans both methodological innovation and practical application. First, the thesis focuses on short-term decisions;daily activity and travel scheduling, capturing intra-houshold dependencies in daily activity scheduling. This thesis introduces the household-level OASIS (Optimisation-based Activity Scheduling with Integrated Simultaneous choice dimensions),an integrated household scheduling framework based on mixed-integer utility optimisation. Household schedules are simulated such that the household utility is maximised, subject to individual and household constraints and preferences.Multiple scheduling dimensions-activity participation, location, timing, duration, participation mode (solo or joint), and transport mode-are simulated within a single framework. Intra-household interactions are embedded through constraints and objective function, capturing vehicle allocation, task sharing, escorting, joint participation, and ride-sharing.This integrated simulation framework explicitly reflects complex intra-household interactions in disaggregated results,illustrating how such interactions can lead individuals to deviate from schedules planned in isolation.This is a general framework applicable to different household compositions and available resources. Second,the framework is operationalised via an estimation process that estimates the parameters of the household schedule utility function from data.Household-level choice sets are generated with a Metropolis Hastings algorithm, and parameters are estimated by a maximum likelihood estimation procedure.Applied to a sampled dataset,the method reproduces realistic distributions of daily activities and yields significant, behaviourally interpretable parameters.Model calibrated at the household level match observed activity patterns better than individual-level model. Third,the analysis extends to long-term urban dynamics using an aggregated multi-year model that links transport and housing through feedbacks,ex