Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.
AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.
In multiple testing, a variety of control metrics of false positives have been introduced such as the Per Family Error Rate (PFER), Family-Wise Error Rate (FWER), the False Discovery Rate (FDR), the False Exceedence Rate (FER). In this talk, we present a comprehensive family of error rates together with a corresponding family of multiple testing procedures (MTP). Based on the needs of the problem at hand, the user can choose a particular member among these MTPs. The new error rate limits the number of false positives FP relative to an arbitrary non-decreasing function s of the number of rejections R. The quantity is called, the scaled false discovery proportion SFDP=FP/s(R). We present different procedures to control either the P(SFDP>q) or the E(SFDP) for any choice of the scaling function. An obvious choice is s(R)=min(R;k). As does FDR, this particular error rate FP/s(R) accepts a fixed percentage of false rejections among all rejections, but only up to R =k, then a stricter control takes over and for R > k, the number of false positives is limited to a percentage of the fixed value k, similar to PFER. The corresponding family of multiple testing procedures bridges the gap between the PFER (k =1) and the FDR (k = number of tests). A similar such bridge is obtained when s(R)=Rg with 0