Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.
AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.
We present an analysis of the thermal response of a hot-wire electroexplosive device (EED) excited with different transient signals. First-order and second-order analytical models to calculate the thermal response of an EED are assessed taking as reference numerical simulations obtained using ANSYS. For the early-time response, when the time is much smaller than the thermal constant of the EED, the best approach corresponds to a first-order differential model in which the thermal capacitance is calculated with short-pulse excitations. A linear simplification to calculate the maximum temperature due to short excitations is also shown to be adequate. On the other hand, the most appropriate model for the late-time response is a second-order model. The models are used to assess the electromagnetic susceptibility of a wired EED for different electromagnetic pulsed environments. Radiated signals produced by a mesoband radiator, two types of radars, and a hyperband radiator are considered. The radar signal proved to be the most disturbing source because of its highest duty cycle and its flat spectral response around a specific frequency. Even the temperature firing threshold can be exceeded with the radiated field produced by a radar of 200 kW of output power located at a distance of 5 m.