Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.
AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.
Lightweight PV modules are attractive for building-integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) applications, especially for renovated buildings, where the additional load bearing capacity is limited. This work focuses on the development of a lightweight, glass-free photovoltaic (PV) module (6 kg/m(2)) composed of a composite sandwich back structure and a polymeric front layer. Sandwich structures are usually manufactured with a vacuum bag process and thermosetting liquid glues (e.g. epoxy resin). However, due to the long manufacturing process ( > 24 h), liquid adhesives are not compatible with conventional solar industry processes. This work presents the development of a robust glass-free PV module based on a composite sandwich architecture manufactured with a simple process. To simplify the production, the standard thermoset epoxy is substituted by different PV encapsulant foils (EVA, ionomer, polyolefin). The results show that a particular formulation of polyolefin is the ideal adhesive to produce a stable backsheet structure. The use of this polymer with a high thermal conductive core (aluminum honeycomb) allows a reduction of processing time from 24 h to 30 min. The mechanical properties of the composite sandwich structure showed an excellent stability under thermal cycling and damp heat with only 1% and 3% loss in bending stiffness, respectively. Two-cell lightweight PV modules manufactured with this backsheet show good electrical performance after thermal cycling and damp-heat tests, for which, respectively, an output power loss of only 3% and 2% is observed. This configuration is up scaled to a sixteen-cell module for which a power loss of only 3% is measured after damp-heat.