Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.
AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.
The thermal boundary conductance (TBC) of metal/dielectric couples was measured for a large variety of metals on silicon, sapphire, and diamond using time domain thermoreflectance and compared to data previously obtained on diamond. In the case of silicon, HF-cleaned and RF-etched surfaces were tested. The detailed structure of these interfaces was studied, allowing distinction of two different cases of M/Si couples: (i) some amount of interfacial reaction exists for both surface terminations, resulting in similar TBCs; and (ii) chemically abrupt interfaces are achieved, resulting in TBC values that are always lower for RF-etched samples. The TBC values obtained on different substrates allowed identifying a tendency of the TBC to scale with the maximum transmission limit. A possible influence of the substrate was evaluated using both the diffuse mismatch model (DMM), which predicts a strong dependence on the substrate properties, and a newly developed approach based on the metal irradiance (IM), which predicts no dependence on the substrate properties. The DMM was implemented using a Debye model with either a linear (DMMLinear) or a Sine-Type (DMMSineType) dispersion, while the IM was implemented using a Sine-Type (IMSineType) dispersion. The DMMLinear and the IMSineType were found to be more suitable than the DMMSineType and to be equally precise in predicting TBC at metal/silicon and metal/sapphire interfaces. The IMSineType is found to be better suited than both the DMMLinear and the DMMSineType to predict TBC at metal/diamond interfaces. IMSineType being the only model tested that is suitable for all three substrates, it appears to be the most appropriate choice. As a corollary, we find that the TBC dependence on substrate properties is much weaker than predicted by the DMM.
Sandro Carrara, Diego Ghezzi, Gian Luca Barbruni