Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.
AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.
Purpose of reviewWhile wearable robotics is expanding within clinical settings, particularly for neurological rehabilitation, there is still a lack of consensus on how to effectively assess the performance of these devices. This review focuses on the most common metrics, whose selection and design are crucial for optimizing treatment outcomes and potentially improve the standard care.Recent findingsThe literature reveals that while wearable robots are equipped with various embedded sensors, most studies still rely on traditional, nontechnological methods for assessment. Recent studies have shown that, although quantitative data from embedded sensors are available (e.g., kinematics), these are underutilized in favor of qualitative assessments. A trend toward integrating automatic assessments from the devices themselves is emerging, with a few notable studies pioneering this approach.SummaryOur analysis suggests a critical need for developing standardized metrics that leverage the data from embedded sensors in wearable robots. This shift could enhance the accuracy of patient assessments and the effectiveness of rehabilitation strategies, ultimately leading to better patient outcomes in neurological rehabilitation.