This paper proposes a dynamic-game theoretic model for the international negotiations that should take place to agree on a global mitigation scheme when the real extent of climate change due to anthropogenic emissions is known. The model assumes a non-cooperative behavior of the parties except for the fact that they will be collectively committed to reach a target on total cumulative emissions by the year 2050. The concept of normalized equilibrium, introduced by J.B. Rosen for concave games with coupled constraints, is used to characterize a family of dynamic equilibrium solutions in an m-player game where the agents are groups of countries and the payoffs are the welfare gains evaluated through a Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model. The equilibrium is computed by implementing an oracle-based optimization method using the implicit definition of the payoffs to the different players obtained in simulations performed with the global CGE model GEMINI-E3. The simulation runs and the manifold of equilibria obtained when the weighting of players varies are discussed and interpreted in economic terms.
Alvaro Ruben Poretti, Charlotte Grossiord, Christoph Bachofen, Eugénie Isabelle Mas, Janisse Deluigi, Laura Mekarni, Margaux Clara Lou Didion-Gency
Marc Vielle, Sigit Pria Perdana