Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.
AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.
Platinum anticancer drugs tend to target DNA whereas certain ruthenium and osmium organometallic compounds, including those with known anticancer activity, preferentially bind histone proteins in chromatin. We earlier found that Ru/Os arene 2-pyridinecarbothioamide antitumor agents display unique or partially overlapping profiles of histone protein binding in the nucleosome compared to Ru arene phosphaadamantane antimetastasis drugs, but the basis for this difference is unclear. Here, we structurally characterized the nucleosome binding effects of arene ligand substitutions and carried out a multiscale simulation analysis, which reveals that the interplay between metal cation and non-leaving ligand identity dictates adduct stability and whether complexes target electronegative surface patches, internal crevices, or both. We show that the nucleosome superhelical crevice acts as a small molecule selectivity filter and that multi-site binding profiles can be expanded or reduced through defined ligand substitutions, which modulate dynamic and steric attributes. Our findings suggest new avenues for rationally developing Ru/Os organometallics that could help expand the scope of chromatin-targeting therapeutics.