Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.
AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.
In Switzerland, grassland takes up 70% of usable farm area, and milk production is almost entirely dependent on local forage production. As a result, current and future changes to the climate pose a major threat to the agricultural sector. Research on extensively managed permanent grasslands in French-speaking Switzerland has shown that plant communities are resistant to drought when the latter occurs early in the growth period. In contrast, if drought occurs later in the season, forage yield losses are pronounced (between 25 and 89%, depending on the site). In these grasslands, intensification of use does not appear to be a viable option for increasing forage yields. Indeed, few options are available to manage drought-related issues. In temporary grasslands, however, there are more drought adaptation strategies, which are primarily based on customising grass community composition. New mixtures that include drought-tolerant species such as tall fescue, lucerne, and sainfoin show promise. When combined with annual or catch crops, a category that includes new species such as sorghum, these mixtures can generally maintain yield levels during drought in temporary grasslands.