Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.
AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.
Hysteresis patterns of different sediment particle sizes were studied via a detailed laboratory study and modelling. Seven continuous rainfall events with stepwise- varying rainfall intensities (15, 30, 45, 60, 45, 30 and 15 mm,h\textsuperscript{-1}, each 20 min duration) were conducted using a 5-m,,2-m erosion flume. Flow rates and sediment concentration data were measured using flume discharge samples, and interpreted using the Hairsine and Rose (HR) soil erosion model. The total sediment concentration and concentrations of seven particle size classes (< 2, 2-20, 20-50, 50-100, 100-315, 315-1000 and > 1000 m) were measured. For the total eroded soil and the finer particle sizes (< 2, 2-20 and 20-50 m), there was a clockwise pattern in the sediment concentration versus discharge curves. However, as the particle size increased, concentrations tended to vary linearly with discharge. The HR model predictions for the total eroded soil and the finer particle size classes (up to 100 m) were in good agreement with the experimental results. For the larger particles, the model provided qualitative agreement with the measurements but concentration values were different. In agreement with previous investigations using the HR model, these differences were attributed to the HR model’s assumption of suspended sediment flow, which does not account for saltation and rolling motions.