Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.
AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.
Motivation. The study of human brain development in its early stage is today possible thanks to in vivo fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques. A quantitative analysis of fetal cortical surface represents a new approach which can be used as a marker of the cerebral maturation (as gyration) and also for studying central nervous system pathologies [1]. However, this quantitative approach is a major challenge for several reasons. First, movement of the fetus inside the amniotic cavity requires very fast MRI sequences to minimize motion artifacts, resulting in a poor spatial resolution and/or lower SNR. Second, due to the ongoing myelination and cortical maturation, the appearance of the developing brain differs very much from the homogenous tissue types found in adults. Third, due to low resolution, fetal MR images considerably suffer of partial volume (PV) effect, sometimes in large areas. Today extensive efforts are made to deal with the reconstruction of high resolution 3D fetal volumes [2,3,4] to cope with intra-volume motion and low SNR. However, few studies exist related to the automated segmentation of MR fetal imaging. [5] and [6] work on the segmentation of specific areas of the fetal brain such as posterior fossa, brainstem or germinal matrix. First attempt for automated brain tissue segmentation has been presented in [7] and in our previous work [8]. Both methods apply the Expectation-Maximization Markov Random Field (EM-MRF) framework but contrary to [7] we do not need from any anatomical atlas prior. Data set & Methods. Prenatal MR imaging was performed with a 1-T system (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee) using single shot fast spin echo (ssFSE) sequences (TR 7000 ms, TE 180 ms, FOV 40 x 40 cm, slice thickness 5.4mm, in plane spatial resolution 1.09mm). Each fetus has 6 axial volumes (around 15 slices per volume), each of them acquired in about 1 min. Each volume is shifted by 1 mm with respect to the previous one. Gestational age (GA) ranges from 29 to 32 weeks. Mother is under sedation. Each volume is manually segmented to extract fetal brain from surrounding maternal tissues. Then, in-homogeneity intensity correction is performed using [9] and linear intensity normalization is performed to have intensity values that range from 0 to 255. Note that due to intra-tissue variability of developing brain some intensity variability still remains. For each fetus, a high spatial resolution image of isotropic voxel size of 1.09 mm is created applying [2] and using B-splines for the scattered data interpolation [10] (see Fig. 1). Then, basal ganglia (BS) segmentation is performed on this super reconstructed volume. Active contour framework with a Level Set (LS) implementation is used. Our LS follows a slightly different formulation from well-known Chan-Vese [11] formulation. In our case, the LS evolves forcing the mean of the inside of the curve to be the mean intensity of basal ganglia. Moreover, we add local spatial prior through a pro