Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.
AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.
We generated a new set of reference geometries of small radicals using experimental equilibrium structures, as well as a benchmark-quality coupled cluster additivity scheme including up to quadruples excitations (CCSDTQ). Using these geometries and a set of experimental vibrational frequencies of open shell diatomics, we evaluated the performance of various coupled cluster methods based mainly on unrestricted references, using Dunning basis sets both with and without core correlation. Contrary to previous results, we found that UCCSD(T) and ROCCSD(T) perform equally well for geometries, better than CCSD, and close to their performances for closed shell systems. No improvement over CCSD(T) was achieved by using a Brueckner reference (BD(T)) or full triples (CCSDT). For frequencies, ROCCSD(T), BD(T), and CCSDT improve upon UCCSD(T), especially for the troublesome NO and CO+ cases. EOMIP-CCSD yields geometries and harmonic frequencies similar to CCSD, and qualitatively correct anharmonic (VPT2) contributions in all cases, like the RO-CC methods. The double hybrid DFT functional B2PLYP-D yields geometries and frequencies of similar quality to that of CCSD but at a much reduced cost. The meta hybrid functionals M06-2X, M06-HF, and BMK perform worse than CCSD, and worse than B3LYP, on average.
Christos Comninellis, Hubert Girault