Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.
AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.
We investigate the role of cooperation in wireless networks subject to a spatial degrees of freedom limitation. To address the worst case scenario, we consider a free-space line-of-sight type environment with no scattering and no fading. We identify three qualitatively different operating regimes that are determined by how the area of the network , normalized with respect to the wavelength , compares to the number of users . In networks with , the limitation in spatial degrees of freedom does not allow to achieve a capacity scaling better than and this performance can be readily achieved by multi-hopping. This result has been recently shown in \cite{FMM09}. However, for networks with , the number of available degrees of freedom is , larger that what can be achieved by multi-hopping. We show that the optimal capacity scaling in this regime is achieved by hierarchical cooperation. In particular, in networks with , hierarchical cooperation can achieve linear scaling.
Andreas Peter Burg, Ruben Merz
Olivier Lévêque, Ayfer Özgür Aydin