Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.
AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.
To realize the full potential of solid-state batteries, the use of high-capacity negative electrodes such as lithium metal or silicon is needed. Silicon represents a safer alternative to lithium metal due to its higher lithiation potential, reducing the risk of dendrite formation. Silicon is challenging to operate at industry-relevant areal capacities with high capacity retention because of its volume change upon de-/lithiation. Furthermore, the insufficient reductive stability of commonly used Li 6 PS 5 Cl electrolyte limits the electrode design to pure silicon electrodes with a 2D interface to the electrolyte, because the electrode-electrolyte surface area needs to be minimized. These 2D silicon electrodes typically require unrealistically high stack pressures of 50 MPa for reliable operation. 1-3 Hydroborate solid electrolytes present an attractive alternative since they combine many attractive characteristics such as high ionic conductivity, high thermal stability, soft mechanical properties, and non-toxicity. We recently showed that hydroborates are compatible with high-voltage LiNi 0.8 Mn 0.1 Co 0.1 O 2 (NMC811) positive electrodes. 4 In this work, we demonstrate that the hydroborate electrolyte Li 3 (CB 11 H 12 ) 2 (CB 9 H 10 ) also offers excellent kinetic stability against reduction in contact with lithiated silicon. 5 This property enables stable cycling of 3D silicon composite electrodes, even when using nano-sized silicon particles and conductive carbon additives. The lithiated 3D silicon composite electrodes feature a low interface resistance growth rate of ~ 0.3 Ω cm 2 h −0.5 at room temperature, in contrast to the rapid interface resistance growth rate of ~ 10 Ω cm 2 h −0.5 observed for the Li 6 PS 5 Cl electrolyte. 1, 2 An excellent initial coulombic efficiency of 96% is reached in half-cells at 60 °C, at a high reversible capacity of 3100 mAh g Si −1 , corresponding to an areal capacity of 8.9 mAh cm −2 . Owing to its high room-temperature conductivity of 1.5 mS cm −1 and wide electrochemical stability window, Li 3 (CB 11 H 12 ) 2 (CB 9 H 10 ) further enables successful integration of the 3D silicon composite electrode with the previously reported composite NMC811 electrode in a zero-lithium-excess full cell with an areal capacity of 3 mAh cm −2 . This NMC811/silicon full cell achieves a remarkable capacity retention of 66% after 100 cycles and respectable rate capability of 2 mAh cm −2 at 1 mA cm −2 at room temperature and under 50 MPa stack pressure. Importantly, a capacity of 2.8 mAh cm −2 is retained under moderate stack pressure of 8 MPa, highlighting the benefits of the 3D composite electrode design.