On the Fiat–Shamir Security of Succinct Arguments from Functional Commitments

We study the security of a popular paradigm for constructing SNARGs, closing a key security gap left open by prior work. The paradigm consists of two steps: first, construct a public-coin succinct interactive argument by combining a functional interactive oracle proof (FIOP) and a functional commitment scheme (FC scheme); second, apply the Fiat–Shamir transformation in the random oracle model. Prior work did not consider this generalized setting nor prove the security of this second step (even in special cases). We prove that the succinct argument obtained in the first step satisfies state-restoration security, thereby ensuring that the second step does in fact yield a succinct non-interactive argument. This holds provided the FIOP satisfies state-restoration security and the FC scheme satisfies a natural state-restoration variant of function binding (a generalization of position binding for vector commitment schemes). Moreover, we prove that notable FC schemes satisfy state-restoration function binding, allowing us to establish, via our main result, the security of several SNARGs of interest (in the random oracle model). This includes a modular security proof of Plonk, in the ROM based on falsifiable Diffie–Hellman assumptions.