Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.
AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.
Accurate modeling of non-covalent interactions involving sulfur today is ubiquitous, particularly with regards to the role played by sulfur-containing heterocycles in the field of organic electronics. The density functional tight binding (DFTB) method offers a good compromise between computational efficiency and accuracy, enabling the treatment of thousands of atoms at a fraction of the cost of density functional theory (DFT) evaluations. DFTB is an approximate quantum chemical approach that is based on the DFT total energy expression. Here we address a critical issue inherent to the DFTB parameterization, which prevents the use of the DFTB framework for simulating non-covalent interactions involving sulfur atoms and precludes its combination with a dispersion correction.1–5 Dramatic examples of structural patterns relevant to the field of organic electronics illustrate that DFTB delivers erroneous (i.e., qualitatively wrong) results involving spurious binding.