Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.
AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.
We perform a systematic DMRG investigation of the two natural spin-1 generalizations of the spin-1/2 Majumdar-Ghosh chain, the spin-1 J(1)-J(2) Heisenberg chain, where J(2) is a next-nearest-neighbor Heisenberg coupling, and the spin-1 J(1)-J(3) model, where J(3) refers to a three-site interaction defined by J(3)[(Si-1 . S-i)(S-i . Si+1) H.c.]. Although both models are rigorously equivalent to the Majumdar-Ghosh chain for spin 1/2, their physics appears to be quite different for spin 1. Indeed, when all couplings are antiferromagnetic, the spin-1 J(1)-J(2) model undergoes an effective decoupling into two next-nearest-neighbor (NNN) Haldane chains upon increasing J(2), while the J(1)-J(3) chain undergoes a spontaneous dimerization similar to the spin-1/2 Majumdar-Ghosh chain upon increasing J(3). By extending the phase diagram to all signs of the couplings, we show that both the dimerized and the NNN-Haldane phase are actually present in the J(1)-J(3) model, the former one adjacent to the Haldane one, the latter to the ferromagneric one, with an Ising transition between them. By contrast, the J(1)-J(2) chain only has a NNN-Haldane phase between the Haldane phase and the ferromagnetic phase for positive J(2). In both cases, our DMRG data are consistent with a continuous Kosterlitz-Thouless transition between the NNN-Haldane and the ferromagnetic phases.